lifestyle7.jpg
divider

GRA et. al. v. Doja; Caruso et. al. v. Doja.


Downtown Los Angeles Superior Court Judge granted summary judgment in favor of our client, a demolition contractor, finding that the indemnity and breach of contract claims against our client failed as a matter of law. Cross-complainants, public entities, sought contractual indemnification from our client for an inverse condemnation claim arising from the construction of a 15.5 acre mix of commercial, retail, entertainment and housing project. The judge agreed that the inverse condemnation claim did not trigger the subcontract’s indemnity provision because there was no evidence that our client was negligent or fraudulent in its work. The judge also granted summary judgment in favor of our client against the developer and owner of the Project for similar reasons. We also successfully recovered costs and expert fees for our client.


separator

separator